Maine backs away from new marketing restrictions

The WSJ reports that politicians in Maine have figured out that the new Maine law prohibiting collecting information from teenagers without parental permission is badly written and has a lot of problems.
The Attorney General has decided not to enforce the law as it stands. The law does contain private right of action, so there may be private suits filed against companies.
I can’t necessarily fault the state senator who drafted the legislation for her intentions.

The law was drafted by Maine state senator Elizabeth Schneider, who said that she tried to align the legislation in accordance with COPPA. She wanted to expand protection for minors after she attended a national conference on prescription drugs and was shocked to learn about some of the techniques companies use to mine information from adolescents, including giving away toys and iPods in exchange for filling out surveys.
She attributes the bill’s problems to the fact that no one showed up to the public hearing about it, where problematic portions could have been discussed and reworded. “I believed that room would be filled with people in opposition to the bill,” she said. “Nobody turned out in opposition to the legislation.”

Good intentions with the bill, protecting minors from predatory marketers. Whether or not the blame is actually on the people who failed to oppose the bill is not nearly as obvious to me.
HT: @ddayman
==
Don’t forget to participate in the DKIM implementation survey. For ESPs. For ISPs. Check back next week for results.
Here is hoping that the new legislation that Sen. Schneider plans to craft during the next legislative session actually accomplishes her goals.

Related Posts

Maine prohibits marketing to minors

Last week, the state of Maine passed a law prohibiting marketing using personal information to minors without verifiable consent from a parent or guardian. From what I understand, this law started out as a prohibition on using health information for marketing and expanded to any personal information.
The law defines personal information as:

Read More

Update on Canadian Law

Neil Schwartzman has an update on the status of the Canadian anti-spam law currently working its way through the legislature.

Read More

Organizing the mail flow

I get a lot of email. On a typical day I will get close to 2000 messages across my various work and personal accounts. About 60 – 70% of that mail is spam and caught by spamassassin or my mta filters and moved into mailboxes that I check once a day for false positives. About 15 – 10% of the remaining mail is from various discussion lists, and those are all sorted into their own mailboxes so I can keep conversations straight. The rest of the email is divided between mail directly to me and various commercial lists I have opted in to.
Up until recently, the commercial mail was all just dumped into my inbox. Nothing special happened to it it just sat there until I could read it. Recently, however, the volume of commercial mail has exploded, swamping my inbox. After losing track of some critical issues, I sat down and fixed my mail filters. Now, all my commercial and marketing mail (ie, mail I signed up for with tagged addresses) is now being filtered into its own mailbox.
There are two takeaways here.
One: the volume of commercial mail has increased significantly. Companies who were previously mailing me once a month are now mailing me twice a week. This contributed to the clutter and resulted in me pushing all commercial mail out of my inbox. I don’t think this increase is limited to just my mailbox, I believe many recipients are seeing an increase in commercial and marketing email, to the point where they’re finding it difficult to keep up with it all.
Two: Recipients have a threshold over which too much email makes their mailbox less usable. Once this threshold is reached they will take steps to change that. In my case, I can just filter all the commercial email as I use tagged addresses for all my signups. In other cases, they may start unsubscribing from all the mail cluttering their mailbox or blocking senders.
It is the tragedy of the commons demonstrated on a small scale.

Read More