AARP, SureClick, Offerweb and Spam

On Tuesday Laura wrote about receiving spam sent on behalf of the AARP. The point she was discussing was mostly just how incompetent the spammer was, and how badly they’d mangled the spam such that it was hardly legible.
One of AARPs interactive advertising managers posted in response denying that it was anything to do with the AARP.

This isn’t from AARP…this is a SPAM that’s been going around for years now. Did you bother looking into the source code to see where it sends you? My guess is it aint AARP…Do you know what your talking about?

Yes, Scott, we do know what we’re talking about, and we did look into the source code.
Yesterday Laura discussed in general principles how mainstream companies typically send spam by hiring a company who hires a company who hires a company to send spam.
We’re fairly familiar with how this works – one of the things Word to the Wise does is to provide forensics and expert witness services in email-related cases – so we dug into this email so as to work out what the story behind it was.
The story, as far as we can tell at a quick look, is that the AARP hired a company called SureClick to generate “Qualified Leads”.

SureClick homepage
You can see that they’re fairly proud to have the AARP as a flagship client.
What do SureClick do for their flagship client? They pay affiliates to drive traffic to their AARP membership signup page. I’m not sure exactly how much they’re paying for each signup, but it must be more than $12 as that’s how much SureClick’s affiliates are, in turn, offering to pay their affilliates.
In the case of the spam sent to Laura the affiliate SureClick hired was OfferWeb. What do OfferWeb do? They pay affiliates to drive traffic to their landing page. Seeing a pattern yet?
OfferWeb then hired a hard core spammer to actually send the spam on AARPs behalf. This guy, apparently based in Utah but spamming from a machine hosted in Pennsylvania, is doing everything he can to avoid his spam being recognised and blocked, using dozens of domains and IP addresses and sending messages stuffed full of hashbusters that have hardly any text, just images, to try and hide from spam filters.
One irony is that the Pennsylvania ISP who is hosting the spammer is also the same ISP who host the email account the spam was sent to. Sometimes the best place to start cleaning up is close to home.
So the spammer sends out millions of pieces of email to addresses he’s harvested or bought, most of which is blocked or ends up in the junk folder. When someone responds he passes them on to OfferWeb, who pass them on to SureClick who sign them up for the AARP. Then the AARP pays SureClick, who keep some of the money and pay OfferWeb, who keep some of the money and give the rest to the spammer.
It’s the advertising budget at AARP, and hundreds of companies like them, that makes this sort of spamming worthwhile.
If you’re interested in where all this data came from, check back tomorrow.

Related Posts

Spam from mainstream companies

Yesterday I wrote about spam I received advertising AARP and used it as an example of a mainstream group supporting spammers by hiring them (or hiring them through proxies) to send mail on their behalf.
My statement appears to have upset someone, though. There is one comment on the post, coming from an IP address allocated to the AARP.

Read More

Fake privacy policies

I sign up at a lot of websites and liberally spray email addresses across the net. These signups are on behalf of one customer or another and each webform gets its own tagged and tracked email address. I always have a specific goal with each signup: getting a copy of a customer’s email, checking their signup process, auditing an affiliate on behalf of a customer or identifying where there might be a problem in a process. Because I have specific goals, I am pretty careful with these signups and usually uncheck every “share my email address” box I can find on the forms.
In every case the privacy policies of my clients and the things they tell me are explicit in that addresses will not be shared. It’s all opt-in, and email addresses are not shared without permission. Even in the cases where I am auditing affiliates, my clients assure me that if I follow this exact process my address will not be shared. Or so the affiliates have assured them.
Despite my care and the privacy policies on the websites, these addresses occasionally leak or are sold. This is actually very rare, and most of the websites I test never do anything with my address that I don’t expect. But in a couple cases these email addresses have ended up in the hands of some hard core spammers (hundreds of emails a day) and there was no useful tracking I could do. In other cases the volume has been lower, and I’ve watched the progression of my email addresses being bought and sold with morbid fascination.
Today an address I signed up at a website about a year ago got hit with multiple spams in a short time frame. All came from different IPs in the same /24. All had different domains with no websites. Whois showed all the domains were registered behind a privacy protection service. Interestingly, two of the domains used the same CAN SPAM address. The third had no CAN SPAM address at all. None of these addresses match the data I have on file related to the email signup.
It never ceases to amaze me how dishonest some address collection outfits. Their websites state clearly that addresses will not be bought an sold, and yet the addresses get lots of spam unrelated to the original signup. For those dishonest enough to do this they’ll never get caught unless recipients tags and tracks all their signups. Even worse, unless their partners test their signups or their mailing practices, the partners may end up unwittingly sending spam.

Read More

Permission is not a legal concept

One trap I see companies fall into when looking at opt-in and permission is they seem to think that permission is a blanket thing. They believe permission can be bought and sold by the companies that collected email addresses.

Read More