More spam graphs

Ken Simpson, CEO of Mailchannels, was kind enough to give me permission to post their graph of spam and email volumes from September 1, 2010 through Jan 3, 2011.

Graph showing connections vs. accepted mail
Spam volumes decreased while delivered mail stayed constant
This chart also shows the trend of declining volumes of spam. There are some differences, though, which I think highlight how you get different pictures when looking at different data sources.
For instance, the amount of real mail (blue line) has remained relatively constant over the 4 month period. There was a slight decrease at the very end of the year, but generally real mail volumes stayed constant. Contrastingly, Senderbase shows that while the average daily spam volume fell from 257 billion emails per day to 92.4 billion emails a day and the average mail volume fell from 300 billion to 108 billion.
Each of the graphs I have posted over the last 2 days has a different way to measure and they are actually measuring very different things. I have some ideas on how Senderbase measures things, but I don’t know any of their specifics. I think they’re doing some direct measurement on their servers and using algorithms to extrapolate total volumes and total spam volumes. In contrast, Mailchannels does outbound mail filtering, so what they are measuring is the amount of mail sent by their customers. The CBL measures just volume into a spamtrap and so is a totally inaccurate way to measure real mail.
Given three totally disparate methods of measuring spam show a decrease, I’m pretty confident in saying that there was a real, measurable decrease in spam loads at the end of 2010. But that’s all I can say based on these data. The decrease may be temporary, it may not. Without understanding more I can’t even make any predictions. I will tell you this, though, I’m very interested in seeing what the graphs look like in a month.

Related Posts

Best practices: a meaningless term

Chad White wrote an article for MediaPost about best practices which parallels a lot of thinking I’ve been doing about how the email marketing industry treats best practices.

Read More

Now you know…

The key to email marketing, at least if you read blogs and talk to experts who blog about such things, is to segment your lists. But what does segmenting your lists really mean? Ken touches on it in a recent article about engagement and segmenting.
Segmenting your list means, quite simply, knowing your audience. It means tailoring your message to them, in order to extract as much money from them as possible. It means knowing which subscribers you can push with volume and which you will lose if you increase things too far.
In short, it means not treating all your subscribers the same, instead treating them slightly differently based on how they interact with your message.
To some people, this is too difficult. Ken even quoted someone in the industry as saying

Read More

Spam volumes in 2010

I started hearing various people comment about lower spam volumes sometime in mid December. This isn’t that unusual, spam volumes are highly variable and someone is always noticing that their spam load is going up or going down. The problem is extrapolating larger trends from a small selection of email addresses. There’s too much variation between email addresses and even domains to make any realistic assumptions about global spam volumes from mail coming into a particular address or domain. And that variation is before you even consider that spam filters prevent much of the spam from actually reaching people.

Read More