Relevance?

As a past guest and/or meeting planner of Millennium Hotels and Resorts we are pleased to share these occasional special offers. If you no longer wish to receive email communications from us, please click the unsubscribe link. Please note that this broadcast is sent from an address which is not monitored. If you have questions about the offer, please contact us directly. Our hotel contact details may be found in this email offer above or you may visit www.millenniumhotels.com.

This is the footer of an email sent by a hotel I stayed at sometime in the past. I thought it was a year ago, but I checked with the groom of that particular wedding party and it seems it was 2 years ago. My, how time flies.
But where is the relevancy to me? I went to the hotel as a part of a block carved out for the above mentioned wedding. It was two years ago and I’ve not been back to that city since. I can understand that there are long periods of time between visits to a city. And I can understand that sending emails to people who haven’t stayed in your hotel in 2 years might make good marketing sense.
What I can’t understand is why this hotel thought that this particular deal might be of interest to me. Remember, I visited said hotel as part of a wedding party. The hotel knows I came just for a wedding. So a good “come back” message might be to visit my friends and take them out for dinner to remember their wedding day. Or something slightly relevant to what I did the last time I was in that city.
What is clearly irrelevant is an offer to come visit the hotel and get tickets to see the local baseball team play. Wait? What? Baseball? Baseball in a city 2 timezones east of me? Really? They know where I live, they could have even made it slightly more relevant by offering me tickets to see one of my local teams play their team. Sadly, no, they didn’t even do that.
Email recipients want mail that speaks to them. That brings them an offer or an idea or information. That makes their lives easier or better or happier. What they don’t need is irrelevant junk clogging up their inbox.
What senders want is email that persuades recipients to buy something.
In this case Millennium hotels gave me fodder for a blog post, which does make today a little easier. But I also unsubscribed from future emails because it’s unlikely I’m going to return to that particular city any time soon. And if I do I’ll probably stay with friends and not in a hotel.
What did Millennium hotels get out of this? Not a whole lot, other than a lot of unsubscribes and probably a number of complaints. Oh and a blog post talking about how badly they ran this particular marketing campaign.
 

Related Posts

Delivery advice from Politico

Politico published an article Sunday looking at the best e-mail lists in politics. Their criteria for choosing the winner focused on list size and recipient engagement, measured by amount of money raised and recipient response to issues. Despite not being a delivery focused article or even mentioning delivery at all, this article is all about delivery.
How can an article be about delivery without ever mentioning the word? By actually looking at the effectiveness of the overall campaign and measuring how the lists actually perform. In the article, Politico used a number of criteria to evaluate different email lists and programs.

Read More

Food for thought

Companies that can’t be bothered to implement good subscription practices will rarely be bothered to send relevant or engaging email.
True or False?

Read More

The rules of delivery success

Senders with delivery problems ask about “the rules.” “Just tell us what the rules are!” “If the ISPs would just tell us what to do we’d do it!” There is only one rule anyone needs to pay attention to for good mail delivery: Respect the recipient.
Not good enough for you? Want more specific rules? OK.
The two rules everyone must follow for good mail delivery.

Read More