Relevance?

As a past guest and/or meeting planner of Millennium Hotels and Resorts we are pleased to share these occasional special offers. If you no longer wish to receive email communications from us, please click the unsubscribe link. Please note that this broadcast is sent from an address which is not monitored. If you have questions about the offer, please contact us directly. Our hotel contact details may be found in this email offer above or you may visit www.millenniumhotels.com.

This is the footer of an email sent by a hotel I stayed at sometime in the past. I thought it was a year ago, but I checked with the groom of that particular wedding party and it seems it was 2 years ago. My, how time flies.
But where is the relevancy to me? I went to the hotel as a part of a block carved out for the above mentioned wedding. It was two years ago and I’ve not been back to that city since. I can understand that there are long periods of time between visits to a city. And I can understand that sending emails to people who haven’t stayed in your hotel in 2 years might make good marketing sense.
What I can’t understand is why this hotel thought that this particular deal might be of interest to me. Remember, I visited said hotel as part of a wedding party. The hotel knows I came just for a wedding. So a good “come back” message might be to visit my friends and take them out for dinner to remember their wedding day. Or something slightly relevant to what I did the last time I was in that city.
What is clearly irrelevant is an offer to come visit the hotel and get tickets to see the local baseball team play. Wait? What? Baseball? Baseball in a city 2 timezones east of me? Really? They know where I live, they could have even made it slightly more relevant by offering me tickets to see one of my local teams play their team. Sadly, no, they didn’t even do that.
Email recipients want mail that speaks to them. That brings them an offer or an idea or information. That makes their lives easier or better or happier. What they don’t need is irrelevant junk clogging up their inbox.
What senders want is email that persuades recipients to buy something.
In this case Millennium hotels gave me fodder for a blog post, which does make today a little easier. But I also unsubscribed from future emails because it’s unlikely I’m going to return to that particular city any time soon. And if I do I’ll probably stay with friends and not in a hotel.
What did Millennium hotels get out of this? Not a whole lot, other than a lot of unsubscribes and probably a number of complaints. Oh and a blog post talking about how badly they ran this particular marketing campaign.
 

Related Posts

Delivery advice from Politico

Politico published an article Sunday looking at the best e-mail lists in politics. Their criteria for choosing the winner focused on list size and recipient engagement, measured by amount of money raised and recipient response to issues. Despite not being a delivery focused article or even mentioning delivery at all, this article is all about delivery.
How can an article be about delivery without ever mentioning the word? By actually looking at the effectiveness of the overall campaign and measuring how the lists actually perform. In the article, Politico used a number of criteria to evaluate different email lists and programs.

Read More

Bad subject lines

I tend not to blog too much on subject lines as they are really a marketing issue and a subscriber relationship issue. The subject lines a particular mailer uses should be directed and developed with an eye towards making the mail relevant and useful to the recipient.
What subject lines shouldn’t be is deceptive, either intentionally or inadvertantly. How can a subject line be inadvertantly deceptive? Take this: “Today only! One day sale!” The email in question was a printable coupon to get a discount at a bookstore. Unfortunately, the sales was not “Today” – the day the email was received.
On the one hand, I can sympathize with the sender. Sometimes email takes a while to get delivered, particularly for large mail drops. So you want to send before the mail needs to be in the inbox and in front of the recipient. But, that means that some of your recipients may get the email before “Today.” A much better subject line would have been “Friday only! One day sale!”

Read More

Setting expectations at the point of sale

In my consulting, I emphasize that senders must set recipient expectations correctly. Receiver sites spend a lot of time listening to their users and design filters to let wanted and expected mail through. Senders that treat recipients as partners in their success usually have much better email delivery than those senders that treat recipients as targets or marks.
Over the years I’ve heard just about every excuse as to why a particular client can’t set expectations well. One of the most common is that no one does it. My experience this weekend at a PetSmart indicates otherwise.
As I was checking out I showed my loyalty card to the cashier. He ran it through the machine and then started talking about the program.
Cashier: Did you give us your email address when you signed up for the program?
Me: I’m not sure, probably not. I get a lot of email already.
Cashier: Well, if you do give us an email address associated with the card every purchase will trigger coupons sent to your email address. These aren’t random, they’re based on your purchase. So if you purchase cat stuff we won’t send you coupons for horse supplies.
I have to admit, I was impressed. PetSmart has email address processes that I recommend to clients on a regular basis. No, they’re not a client so I can’t directly take credit. But whoever runs their email program knows recipients are an important part of email delivery. They’re investing time and training into making sure their floor staff communicate what the email address will be used for, what the emails will offer and how often they’ll arrive.
It’s certainly possible PetSmart has the occasional email delivery problem despite this, but I expect they’re as close to 100% inbox delivery as anyone else out there.

Read More