Check your unsubscribe process

When was the last time you actually tried to unsubscribe from one of your mailing lists? Have you ever even checked to see that your process works?
For whatever reason, unsubscribe processes don’t always work. Sometimes the problem is on the client end. Sometimes the problem is on the ESP end. But in either case, continuing to mail recipients who have attempted to opt-out from your mail is a recipe for disaster.
I mentioned last week about our new mortgage company that can’t process my unsubscribe. Today I contacted their ESP and pointed out I’d tried to unsub a few times, but was still getting mail. The ESP thanked me, pointed out that was not an ESP managed unsubscribe page and did a little digging. A few hours later their delivery guy told me that he saw my multiple unsubscribe attempts (June, July, 2 in August…) and they were all marked as “trashed.”  But he’s going to make sure I’m not mailed any more and follow up with his customer.
Now, there are a lot of reasons this unsub process could have failed. It could be that the website doesn’t handle my tagged addresses well and this is a bank, it’s very possible security is locked down. But that means they shouldn’t have accepted my tagged address in the first place.
There are a couple things to take away from this story.

  1. If you’re a company using your own unsub process, not your ESPs, make sure it works.
  2. Do the same data verification during address collection signup as you do during unsubscription processing.
  3. Test your unsubscription process.

One of my clients has brought me in to deal with problems in their unsubscribe process. In this case, they are a brick and mortar accepting addresses at point of sale. Unfortunately, there was no data verification in their process and one of their customers gave them an address belonging to someone else. This other person works at a large filtering company. To this person’s credit, her first step was to attempt to unsubscribe from the list. When the unsubscription failed, the sender was added to the filtering company’s main filters. This caused all sorts of delivery issues. The company came to me to advise them on fixing their issues and manage the delisting process.
This client discovered that their unsubscribe process was very broken. They worked with their ESP and thought they fixed the unsub problems. I talked to the filtering company and resolved the issue. Unfortunately, a few weeks later my client attempted to email active users and had the same filtering problems as before. In talking with the filtering company, the address mailed was, again, the address that had been unsubscribed.
There are a couple things to take away from this story.

  1. If you’re a company using your ESPs unsubscribe process, make sure it works.
  2. A click on an unsubscribe link is not the same as a click on another link in the email. Don’t count them the same.
  3. Test your unsubscription process.

I know that unsubscribe pages and data integrity are totally unsexy parts of an email marketing program. They’re not what drives revenue, in fact, they’re things that when done well can lower revenue. But they’re vital to the long term health of any email marketing program. Continuing to mail people who don’t want your mail drives up complaints. More complaints result in more delivery problems. Even worse, people who work at filtering companies get mail to. And “spamming employees, not allowing opt-out” is a valid filtering criteria at most places.
Sign up with a new email address at your list this week. Try to opt-out next week. Does it work?

Related Posts

You can't technical yourself out of delivery problems

In many cases these days, many more cases than a lot of senders want to admit, delivery problems at the big ISPs are a result of sending mail recipients just don’t care about. The reason your mail is going to bulk? It’s not because you have minor problems in your headers. It’s not because you have some formatting issues. The reason is because your recipients just don’t care if the ISP delivers your mail or not.
A few years ago the bulk of my clients hired me to do technical audits for their mail. I fixed a lot of delivery problems that way. They’d send me their email and I’d run it through tools here and identify things they were doing that were likely to be causing problems. I’d give them some suggestions of things to change. Believe it or not, minor tweaks to headers and configuration actually did make a lot of difference in delivery.
Over time, though those tweaks less effective to fix delivery problems. Some of it is due to the MTA vendors, they’re a lot better at sending technically correct mail than they were before. There are also a lot more people giving good advice on the underlying structure and format of emails so senders can send technically clean email. I started seeing technically perfect emails from clients who were seeing major delivery problems.
There are a number of reasons that technical fixes don’t work like they used to. The short version, though, is that ISPs have dealt with much of the really blatant spam and they can focus more time and energy on the “grey mail”.
This makes my job a little harder. I can no longer just look at an email, maybe run it through some of our tools and provide a few suggestions that fix delivery problems. Delivery isn’t that simple any longer. Filters are really more focused on how the recipients react to mail. That means I need to know a lot more about a clients email program before I can even start to identify what might be causing the delivery issues.
I wish it were still so simple I could give minor technical tweaks that would appear to magically improve a client’s delivery. It was a lot simpler process then. But filters have evolved, and senders must evolve, too.

Read More

Misdirected email

Al has another post about another company sending mail to a customer that gave an email address that didn’t belong to them. The person receiving the misdirected email has no effective way to make it stop, and is getting more and more frustrated with the ongoing spam. (Consumerist article)

Read More