Handling replies to bulk mail

This week’s Wednesday question comes from Ryan W.

I’ve been noticing a few e-mail accounts who reply to our e-mail sends with spammy type replies such as, “hey this is intense…..(link)” what do you think should we be removing those e-mails from our mailing?

There is no real clear answer to this question, but it’s certainly one that deserves some discussion. These replies are often the result of malicious behavior. Individual email accounts are compromised through some method or another. Once the account is compromised, the spammer sets up an automatic reply that sends out the message you’re seeing whenever email is received at the compromised address. In some cases this is done without any other interference in the email account and the user never knows they’re sending these messages out unless notified by a third party.
Most of these accounts are live accounts. There are real people there and they are your subscribers and purchasers. Removing them is not obviously the right thing for either the sender or the receiver. At the same time these spams can cause problems for senders if they come in sufficient volume.
My advice is to look at the data. I don’t think there is one answer to the question or even one blanket answer for a particular company. Here are the things I suggest considering when making the decision.

  1. Is this a new account / subscription or is this a long standing customer?
  2. How active has this subscriber been with previous mails? Did they click or open emails? Are they a frequent purchaser?
  3. What’s the revenue loss if we stop sending to this address?
  4. What’s the cost to continue sorting through spam in your reply-to account?

If this is a new account, then it may not be worth your time to wade through reply spam in order to sell. It may be a good idea, though, to send a confirmation message to the account. You will want to confirm that the account really has a human behind it and that it has not been totally taken over by the spammer.
If this is an account that has been on your list for a while, there is a different calculation to make. When you have history with a customer you can directly measure revenue versus cost. Clearly if handling the spam costs more than the subscriber brings in, then removing the address is a good idea. If, however, this is a high value subscriber then it may be worth employee time to sort through the spam.
Another option is to notify the subscribers That their account has been compromised. I actually don’t recommend this. Some scammers use fake notifications and sending real notifications can cause confusion and distrust.
That’s a vey long way to say I don’t have a specific recommendation for unsubscribing addresses sending,out spam in reply to mail. It really depends on what the specific volume is and how much the spam is interfering with normal customer interaction. Also, how long has this been happening? If this email account is used for talking with friends or family then the recipient will be notified by their normal correspondents reasonably quickly. Accounts that continue to send auto replies over weeks or months are probably abandoned and can safely be removed from your database.
 
===
Have a question you want answered? Tweet them to wise_ laura or send them to laura-questions@wordtothewise.com.

Related Posts

Data hygiene and bouncing zombies

There are a number of folks who tell me there can be no zombie addresses on their lists, they aggressively remove any address that bounces. The problem is that zombie addresses don’t bounce, at least not always. And even when ISPs say they have a policy to bounce email after a certain period of time with no access, that’s not always put into practice.
How do I know that ISPs don’t always deactivate addresses on the schedules they publish? Because I have seen addresses not be deactivated.
I have addresses in a lot of places that I go for long periods of time not checking. It’s rare that they’re taken from me or reject mail – most of the time they’re special test addresses I use when diagnosing issues. This post is based on my experiences with those addresses and how abandoned addresses are treated at some ISPs.
For Gmail I have two examples of addresses not being deactivated.
In July 2011, we set up a test address to look at how Gmail was handling authentication. We sent a matrix of different test emails to it, with valid and invalid SPF and DKIM signatures. We pulled the data from the account. I don’t know for certain when the last time I logged in, but it was August or September of last year. So we have an address that has been dormant since September 2011.
I just sent mail to the account and google happily accepted it.
Mar  2 07:03:22 misc postfix/smtp[11770]: 11CA12DED3: to=<wttwtestacct@gmail.com>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.127.27]:25, delay=1.8, delays=0.25/0.02/0.56/0.93, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1330700602 x8si8608852pbi.66)
I have another google account (apparently) that my records show I set up sometime in 2010. The login info was saved October 2010. I don’t know when the last time I logged in was, but given I’d forgotten the existence of the account it’s a good bet that it has been more than a year. That account is also accepting mail as of today.
Mar  2 07:06:25 misc postfix/smtp[11836]: 8D90C2DED3: to=<phphendrie@gmail.com>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.127.27]:25, delay=1.6, delays=0.26/0.02/0.68/0.66, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 OK 1330700785 a8si4075740icw.96)
For Hotmail I also have quite a bit of history and information. I signed up for my first Hotmail account in 1997. That was an account I used the address to post to usenet, but I didn’t actually use it for mail. I’d check it occasionally (usually when someone said in the newsgroup that they were going to email me) but it wasn’t an address I used regularly. As I moved from posting regularly in usenet, I started checking that account even less.
For a while, if I went more than 6 months checking my Hotmail account they would make me “re-claim” it. What would happen when I’d log in is I’d get a message along the lines of “well, we disabled this account due to inactivity, do you want it back?” I’d say yes, have to go through the setup process again and it would be my account. Mail was deleted during the disabling, and I am guessing they rejected anything new going to that account. I went through this dance for 4 or 5 years. I even had my calendar set to remind me to login every 6 months or so. There was some sentimental value to the address that kept me logging in. I have that same username at every major free ISP: Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo and AOL, so it’s “my” address.
About 6 or 7 years ago, that behavior changed. I stopped getting the request to reclaim my account. Instead I could just log in. I’d still have mail (mostly spam as the address is on *lots* of lists and millions CDs). I still check it irregularly. I don’t have any idea when the last time I checked it was, but I think it’s been since at least November and probably longer back than that. Hotmail is still accepting mail for that address as well.
It’s anecdotal evidence, at best, but it ‘s the type of evidence that is acceptable even when it’s anecdotal. There are some addresses that are abandoned for long periods of time at the free mailbox providers and they’re are not all automatically pulled from the ranks of active addresses.
What does this mean for senders? It means that data hygiene has to go beyond just removing addresses that bounce. ISPs are not disabling addresses consistently enough for marketers to be able to trust that all addresses on their list are active just because they are accepting email.
This is the root of the recommendation to put in a hygiene program, this is why senders need to look at who is actually engaged with their brand and make some hard decisions about shooting zombies in the head.

Read More

Is Amazon SES a reputable place to send mail from

On the first installment of our Wednesday question series, I chose a question from twitter.

Read More