Fast and loose

Politicians often play fast and loose with permission and data. This can cause them all sorts of problems with email delivery at major ISPs. I really expect that politicians buy, sell, transfer, spindle, mutilate and fold data. If they can use it to further their goals, they will. And, many of the consumer protection and privacy laws don’t apply to political groups.

The news that Representative Bachman may have known that some of her mailing list was taken and used by others is a surprise even to me. I talked with a few ESP reps, though, and they told me that this was mostly par for the course and that they often have a lot of delivery and compliance issues with their political clients. Many have had to suspend or terminate political clients, and a couple people mentioned SBL listings.

This isn’t a problem with just one side of the political spectrum, it seems endemic in how the game is played.



1 comment

  1. Catherine Jefferson says

    Not all political bulk email campaigns are alike. The practices you mention are common in politics, but there are campaigns that are cleaner than usual and campaigns that are the opposite.

    Spamhaus nailed one group of especially nasty political spambags last fall that ran a snowshoe spam operation for the 2012 Romney presidential campaign:

    Activate Direct wasn’t just spamming for Romney. I got spam for a number of other politicians, including a few Democrats, and as I recall even some non-profit organizations in California. I was a Romney supporter, but this suggests that Romney’s judgement about the people who ran critical parts of his campaign was lacking, to put it kindly. :/

    Prior to 2012, I can think of one really egregious example of national-scale political spam in the U.S. — the 2008 Ron Paul botnet. It was apparently run by Paul supporters, not the Paul campaign, but you never really know. In 2012, in contrast, the Paul campaign ran a really clean operation. They either never were behind the botnet in 2008, or learned their lesson.

    Meanwhile, the Obama campaign ran a fairly clean bulk email operation by political standards. They hit a few of my spamtraps and a few at blocklists and reputation services, and played fast and loose with opt-in. They didn’t run a botnet or hire snowshoe spammers, however. Even better, typoed subscriptions to their list tended to fall off the list after a month or two of inactivity. To me, that suggests that somebody who understands list management (either in-house or at their ESP Blue State Digital) took measures to ensure that they did not continue to send huge quantities of email for months to email addresses that showed no signs of interest or life.

    i hope that ESPs and (even more) politicians of all stripes are reading this blog and learn some lessons from it. 😉


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Lost in the mists of time

    Over on the Farsight Security blog Joe St. Sauver talks about some of the early days of online abuse, on usenet. Laura and I were on the periphery of early usenet abuse, mostly as users, but Usenet (and IRC) around then were the places we both started with email abuse.No Comments

  • Ongoing Yahoo delays

    I've been hearing from folks over the last few days that they're seeing an uptick in deferrals from Yahoo! The deferrals are not uniform. ESPs report they're seeing some, but not all, customers affected. Other ESPs aren't seeing any changes. It's not just you. But it would be very worthwhile to dig into engagement and other stats. It's possible this is a new normal at Yahoo! and they're tightening filters to catch mail that doesn't fit their standards but was previously difficult to filter.No Comments

  • AOL starts using Sender Score Certification

    Good news for Sender Score Certified IPs. Return Path recently announced that AOL has joined the list of ISPs offering preferential treatment to certified IPs.  1 Comment