4 things the new outlook ads tell us about email

Microsoft has a new TV ad showing how trivial it is to remove unwanted email from the inbox. Various busy people use the “sweep” and “delete” functions to clean up mail. The commercial even have a segment counting up the hundreds of emails deleted.
This tells me a few things.Images of all my different filters

  1. Email isn’t dead. Major companies are still investing in email products and creating tools that help users organize and manage incoming messages: Outlook.com is the newest mail product from Microsoft, Yahoo is working on their mail client, AOL launched a new product last year, Gmail is still tweaking their client. Email is here to stay.
  2. People use email as more than just communication. “Inbox Zero” is not just for businesses any more, that concept is running over into personal mail, too. People use their inboxes as scheduling tools, todo lists and reminders. I expect to see more things like mailboxapp to help people deal with email as a scheduling device.
  3. People want to be able to deal with messages in bulk in their mailbox. This seems obvious but when mail is sent in bulk, people want to be able to deal with it in bulk. This is the most relevant point for marketers, I think. Send lots of mail, people are going to develop techniques for dealing with that mail. My techniques centers around filters and segregating different mail into different mailboxes, as shown in the screenshot to the right.
  4. People are seeing so much mail in their inbox they can’t always find what they want. The new tools help organize mail better making it easier to find that mail from the best friend or the most recent sales at your favorite store.

I think it’s great that mailbox providers are thinking about how people use mail and how to make the inbox more pleasant and more useable. This is good for recipients, but it’s also good for marketers. Being able to find mail can be a challenge for heavy email users. Better tools for organization means finding those messages is less of a challenge.

Related Posts

Holomaxx doubles down

Holomaxx has, as expected, filed a motion in opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by both Yahoo (opposition to Yahoo motion and Hotmail (opposition to Microsoft motion). To my mind they still don’t have much of an argument, but seem to believe that they can continue with this.
They are continuing to claim that Microsoft is scanning email before the email gets to Microsoft (or Yahoo) owned hardware.

Read More

Email marketing OF THE FUTURE!

ISPs are continually developing tools for their users. Some of the newer tools are automatic filters that help users organize the volumes of mail they’re getting. Gmail released Priority Inbox over a year ago. Hotmail announced new filters as part of Wave 5 back in October.
All of these announcements cause much consternation in the email marketing industry. Just today there was a long discussion on the Only Influencers list about the new Hotmail filtering. There was even some discussion about why the ISPs were doing this.
I think it’s pretty simple why they’re creating new tools: users are asking for them. The core of these new filters is ISPs reacting to consumer demand. They wouldn’t put the energy into development if their users didn’t want it. And many users do and will use priority inbox or the new Hotmail filtering.
Some people are concerned that marketing email will be less effective if mail is not in the inbox.

Read More

Yahoo looking harder at engagement

In a post this morning, Dan Deneweth from Responsys says he’s received confirmation from Yahoo that they have increased the value of engagement metrics when making delivery decisions.
The really great thing, for the ISPs, about engagement metrics is that they directly measure how much a particular email is wanted by recipients. There’s no guessing about it, it measures how engaged the recipient is with a mail. Even better is the fact that, unlike proxy metrics, engagement metrics are extremely difficult for the sender to manipulate. As a sender I can artificially lower complaints and bounces without improving the mail I’m sending. But I can’t improve engagement metrics without actually engaging my recipients.
As I wrote back in 2010:

Read More