Gmail tabs … good for marketers?

It appears to be Google’s turn as the subject of most of my blog posts these days.
Consumerist had a post up today talking about the new Gmail tabs. Interestingly enough, they’re quoting an Ad Age article that says the new tabs are not hurting engagement.

Early results are surprising. Response rates have actually gone up or stayed the same for most companies. Mega-marketer Epsilon notes that slightly fewer Gmail users are opening e-mails in the first place, but the same number of people are actually clicking through and buying stuff.

One thing I’ve found interesting is how much effort many companies are putting into emails to get users to move mail from the “promotions” tab to the “primary” tab. I’ve been recommending for years that companies enlist their recipients to improve their delivery. And many, many of these marketers have resisted asking users to take any steps that might help delivery, including asking users to click this is not spam or add to address book. Yet, now, marketers are creating entire campaigns to get users to move to the “primary” tab.
Marketers enlisting users to improve email delivery may be the first sign of a shift in the sender / recipient relationship. Instead of recipients being seen as passive, marketers are seeing them as partners. No longer are recipients just targets, but they’re actual participants in the merchant / customer relationship.
Alternatively, marketers are just panicking about a change outside of their control and are doing anything to try and stop that change. However, the data seem to suggest that this may not be a bad change at all. Not all change is bad.

Related Posts

DKIM and Gmail

After they were a a little embarrassed by their own DKIM keys being poorly managed a few months ago, Google seem to have been going through their inbound DKIM handling and tightening up on their validation so that badly signed mail that really shouldn’t be treated as DKIM signed, won’t be treated as signed by Gmail.
This is a good thing, especially as things like DMARC start to be layered on top of DKIM, but it does mean that you really need to check your signing configuration and make sure you’re not doing anything silly.

Read More

4 things the new outlook ads tell us about email

Microsoft has a new TV ad showing how trivial it is to remove unwanted email from the inbox. Various busy people use the “sweep” and “delete” functions to clean up mail. The commercial even have a segment counting up the hundreds of emails deleted.
This tells me a few things.Images of all my different filters

Read More

Gmail says no expectation of privacy, kinda.

Consumer Watch put out a press release yesterday about a court filing made by Gmail that says Gmail users have no expectation of privacy. I pulled a bunch of the docs yesterday, but have had no real time to read or digest them.
For recap users everything I pulled (and stuff other people have pulled) are available at Archive.org.
The initial complaint was filed under seal at the request of Google. The redacted complaint doesn’t tell us a lot, but it’s available for people to read if they’re interested.
The doc everyone is talking about is Google’s Motion to Dismiss. Everyone is up in arms about Google saying, in that filing, “a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties.” (page 28, line 9). What no one seems to have mentioned is that this is actually a quote from a case that Google is referencing. The whole paragraph may lead one to a different conclusion.

Read More