What We Do

Occasionally when we meet longtime readers of the blog at conferences and industry events, they are surprised to learn that we are not just bloggers. We actually spend most of our time consulting with companies and service providers to optimize their email delivery. Though we try to avoid using the blog as a WttW sales pitch, we thought it might be useful to devote a short post to explaining a bit more about what we do.

Most of the companies we work with have strong email marketing and technical expertise, but face challenges beyond normal “best practice” recommendations. To get started, companies often engage with Word to the Wise in one of two ways:

  • Technical Audit: a short-term engagement designed to identify and resolve any underlying issues that may be causing delivery problems. We will look at message and header structures, content issues, and sender reputation or authentication problems.

  • Strategic Consulting: Some of our clients have dubbed this “email therapy”, and these engagements are structured a lot like that – we speak once or twice each week for several months about our client’s specific challenges and collaborate closely to work on larger programmatic and technical issues around optimizing email programs. We really enjoy this type of deep forensic work and helping clients create more sustainable programs.

That said, we very much believe that there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to this sort of work. We are also happy to work with companies that don’t have established expertise in-house, or who are in the process of developing email programs. We have a wide range of additional services we provide, from data analysis to ISP/ESP relations to blocklist resolution.

In general, we want to provide support for email program managers and systems administrators to create and manage meaningful and valuable customer communication. Our experience working with a broad range of senders over many years, as well as our close relationships with ISPs, ESPs, spam fighters and blocklists, policy and governance bodies, and other email consultancies gives us both broad and deep insight into the current landscape of email. If you think your company could benefit from this type of support, please get in touch!

Related Posts

Mythbusting deliverability and engagement

Yesterday I published an article talking about an engagement webinar hosted by the EEC and DMA. I made a couple predictions about what would be said.

Read More

Tweets from engagement and deliverability webinar

Want to see some of the tweets shared during the EEC Deliverability and Engagement webinar on March 17? Check out what was said as it happened.

Read More

Updated M3AAWG Best Practices for Senders

M3AAWG has published a new version of the Senders Best Common Practices document and the contains a lot of new information since the original publication in 2008. The new document covers how to vet ESP customers, considerations when selecting a dedicated or share IP to send mail, and includes best practices on a number of technical processes.
The Senders Best Common Practices document is targeted at deliverability teams and email marketers. Any company that is sending marketing emails, using an Email Service Provider, or provides an email enabled platform, it’s always good to go back and periodically review your system to ensure nothing was missed and to stay up-to-date on all new recommendations.
A few of the recommendations include the use of the List-Unsubscribe header, publishing a clear WHOIS for domains used for sending mail, and how to process non-delivery report messages.
The List-Unsubscribe header provides an additional way for users to opt-out of email messages. Gmail and Outlook.com both use the presence of the list-unsubscribe header to provide a one-click button to allow the user to unsubscribe from the mailing list. Often enough, if a user cannot find an opt-out link, they’re marking the message as spam. Allowing a recipient to unsubscribe easily is critical to maintaining good delivery reputation.
A WHOIS is query to determine who is the registered user or assignee of a domain name. During a session at the most recent M3AAWG meeting, it was announced that spammers throw away 19 million domains per year. When a postmaster or abuse desk receive a complaint, they’ll often query to see who owns the domain the email was sent from or who owns the domains used in the hyperlinks. If the WHOIS record is out of date or set to private, this limits the ability for the postmaster or abuse desk to reach out to the owner of the domain.
Processing non-deliver reports is critical to maintaining a high delivery reputation. Many ESPs have an acceptable-use-policy that includes a bounce rate. Mailjet recommends a bounce rate of less than 8% and Mandrill recommends less than 5%. If a system is not in place to remove the hard bounces from your mailing list, the sender’s reputation will quickly deteriorate.
The Senders Best Common Practices document can be downloaded at M3AAWG.org.
 

Read More