Ask Laura: What about Transactional Opt-Outs?

AskLaura_Heading3
Dear Laura,
We are having a bit of an internal struggle on our end as we launch our new quarterly account summaries. What are your views on including an unsubscribe link in these emails?
My personal opinion is that we should. Although the summaries can be classified as “transactional”, they are not tied to a specific recent transaction a customer made and can be viewed as a general reminder to shop again. As I gathered data to present my case, I reviewed several different account summaries and I found it split close to 50/50. Do you have any data or thoughts to support one way or another?
Thanks,
Summary Judgement


Dear Summary,
I believe there are very, very few recurring messages that should not have an unsubscribe link. Even many one-time messages should have an unsub link, particularly in situations where the address is not confirmed. Because even the cleanest, most perfect subscription process will get the wrong address some time, you want that person to be able to make the mail stop.
I was recently in a situation where we cancelled a SaaS contract last December but was still getting “service notifications” that we couldn’t opt out of. The service notifications are reasonable for companies who are still paying said SaaS provider. But we’re not paying them. And we can’t opt-out. And I really wished they’d stop emailing me notices about when they’re going to upgrade our hardware instance… because we have none. I did contact their ESP, who was very helpful in both getting the mail to stop and tracking down the problem.
If you’re looking for ways to discuss this internally there are a couple approaches I might suggest.
One is to talk about why people think these messages are so important that the user should have no choice in receiving them. Make people actually articulate their thought processes behind their belief. The underlying reason is often something like “because it’s a touchpoint and we don’t have to let them opt-out legally, so we can get our brand in front of them without breaking any laws.” That’s not really a good enough idea to force people to receive your message.
From an overall deliverability perspective, allowing users to unsubscribe gives you more insight into and control over your mailing program. If people don’t want to receive mail from you, they have the ability to stop receiving mail from you. They can “opt out” even if you don’t let them.
This-is-spam hits mean all future mail will go to the bulk folder, specific “block this sender” filters. In most cases the user having to block or spam a mail reduces the actual inbox deliveries and depending on how you’re set up, it may reduce inboxing of ALL your mail, not just the quarterly account summaries. Explain this to your colleagues and suggest that an unsubscribe link might actually be a more elegant, and less frustrating, solution.


 
Confused about delivery in general? Trying to keep up on changing policies and terminology? Need some Email 101 basics? This is the place to ask. We can’t answer specific questions about your server configuration or look at your message structure for the column (please get in touch if you’d like our help with more technical or forensic investigations!), but we’d love to answer your questions about how email works, trends in the industry, or the joys and challenges of cohabiting with felines.
Your pal,
Laura

Related Posts

Where did you get my address?

Both Steve and I are trying to get answers from Amazon, Target and Epsilon about how Target acquired our Amazon specific email addresses. Target phone reps told us the mail we got was a phish, Epsilon is refusing to acknowledge Target is a customer and Amazon has promised us “they’re looking into it.”
Meanwhile, an address of mine was transferred from one customer of an ESP to another customer of the same ESP. At first I was told I must have signed up for the mail; as proof I was provided with the data I supposedly signed up. When I explained no that wasn’t true, the abuse desk told me they had discovered there was a mistake and that “These two clients use the same 3rd party ESP and they had mixed the files.” I’m not actually sure who “they” refers to, but as long as they’ve untangled the files I am not going to argue. The sad part is that it took an escalation to Return Path (the IP sending the mail is certified) to get anyone to actually respond to my report of an address given to Company A being mailed by Company B.
On the flip side, mail showed up today that actually had a link for “how was I added?”
Atari_Optout
When you click on the link it shows exactly where the address came from and when it was added to the list.
How_was_I_added_to_this_list_
It would be great if more companies provided this information to their recipients. I think it would probably decrease spam reports and make consumers feel more comfortable about how companies are collecting and using information.

Read More

Logging in to unsubscribe

I have been talking with a company about their unsubscribe process and their placement of all email preferences behind an account login. In the process, I found a number of extremely useful links about the requirements.
The short version is: under the 2008 FTC rulemaking senders cannot require any information other than an email address and an email preference to opt-out of mail. That means senders can’t charge a fee, they can’t ask for personal information and they can’t require a password or a login to unsubscribe.
I’ve talked about requiring a login to unsubscribe in the past here on the Word to the Wise blog.
Let them go
Questions about CAN SPAM
One click, two click, red click, blue click
How not to handle unsubscribes
I’m not the only person, though, that’s written about this.
The FTC has written about it in the FTC CAN SPAM Compliance Guide for business

Read More

TWSD: Hiding the opt-out


This is an actual opt-out link that came in a recent email. Sadly, this is a real company, listed on the NYSE sent by a major ESP.
 

Read More