Google takes on intrusive interstitials


Starting next January, Google will be modifying its mobile search results to lower the ranking of sites that use interstitials that interfere with the users experience. In a blog post announcing the change they explain:

Pages that show intrusive interstitials provide a poorer experience to users than other pages where content is immediately accessible. This can be problematic on mobile devices where screens are often smaller. To improve the mobile search experience, after January 10, 2017, pages where content is not easily accessible to a user on the transition from the mobile search results may not rank as highly.

While this doesn’t have any effect on email delivery, I think it’s noteworthy to mention here for 2 reasons.
First, many interstitials are subscription boxes. If subscription boxes are considered an “intrusive interstitial” then websites may suffer lower visitation due to lower Google ranking. This will result in fewer signups from mobile devices. Removing the interstitial will reduce signup rates, another unwelcome consequence to this change. I don’t have a good solution, although it may be as simple as not showing interstitials to users coming directly from Google. Folks who use interstitials for signups should be looking at this issue now.
Second, it clearly demonstrates the priority Google puts on user experience. Many users get frustrated when they go to a site and there is immediately something blocking the information they’re looking for. Google has heard this and is trying to make their results less frustrating for users. This attitude is also a part of their filtering and blocking decisions. Mail that is deemed annoying or frustrating for users may go to the bulk folder, even when they’re lacking overt spam signs. We’ve certainly seen cases where mail gets filtered with no clear reason other than “people have reported mail like this as spam.”
Overall, I think consumers will appreciate the new search ranking algorithm. I think marketers are going to have to adapt in many ways, not the least of which is figuring out how to collect email addresses without compromising search engine rankings.

About the author


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Interstitial signup boxes are an obstacle to usability, whether you’re coming from a search result or somewhere else.
    1. If I’ve never been to your site before, I’m *not* going to sign up for a newsletter *before* I read your article and figure out whether it’s worth it!
    2. If I have been to your site before, I need to let my browser store a cookie for your site just to avoid the pop-up. Even if I’ve already signed up for your newsletter, or decided to follow your RSS or social media feed instead. (I have my browser set to discard all cookies at the end of a browsing session except for those sites that I want to keep logged in. I realize this makes me less typical but it also makes these first-visit pop-ups even more annoying.)
    And that’s on a desktop. Let’s not even get into the problems on mobile devices where the interstitial won’t close properly because it’s bigger than the viewport, or animates itself so slowly that the close button doesn’t register a tap, or breaks the close script but not the open script, etc.

  • Like Kelson, I find email signup bleg interstitials incredibly annoying, to the point I was considering creating an AdBlock list just for them.

  • Mr. Majid, please do so at your earliest convenience. It would be a great goodness, I think.

By laura

Recent Posts


Follow Us