10 things every mailer must do

A bit of a refresh of a post from 2011: Six best practices for every mailer. I still think best practices are primarily technical and that how senders present themselves to recipients is more about messaging and branding than best practices. These 6 best practices from 2011 are no longer best, these days, they’re the absolute minimum practices for senders.

If you can’t manage to do these, then find someone who can.

  1. Authenticate email with both SPF and DKIM. These are both mature technologies now and it’s long past time that every email is authenticated with both protocols. Bonus points if the authentication domains align with the visible from (5322.from) for DMARC authentication. Negative points if you use cousin domains.
  2. Send technically correct email. Most ESPs manage to do this well these days and a lot of the pressure is off marketers to create templates that are correct. For those who want to create their own templates, Litmus is my go to reference for displaying email.
  3. Stop hammering on bad addresses. This means correctly handling addresses that bounce and implementing some sort of data hygiene that’s appropriate for your lists and market segments. This does not mean hiring some hygiene company to wash your list. You have better data than the hygiene companies if you’re mailing regularly.
  4. Use VERP. VERP means each email is tagged with the subscriber, list, and even mailing. Having that data encoded in the headers allows troubleshooting, bounce processing and FBL processing much, much easier. Again, most ESPs manage this for you.
  5. Send only opt-in mail. I know a lot of people argue permission is passé but I don’t believe that is true. ISPs, receivers and filtering companies don’t like it when you send mail without permission. Yes, even if you’re sending B2B mail. Stop buying lists scraped from LinkedIn and spamming them through your google apps account. People don’t like spam, even when they’re at work. Plus, your “cutesy” “friendly” automated mail looks like every other one out there.
  6. Respect the unsubscribe. If someone unsubscribes then stop mailing them. Do it as fast as possible and make it permanent. The number of senders who reactivate subscriptions months or years after an unsubscribe are legion. It’s not just annoying, it’s illegal in most jurisdictions.
  7. Be up front with recipients how you’re going to use their email address. Don’t hide the opt-in language in your privacy policy.
  8. Have adequate security for recipient information. Really, it’s 2017, time to treat user data as valuable and protect it. Don’t be Equifax.
  9. Monitor your sends. Between opens, clicks, FBLs, straight complaints, Spamcop summary reports, and inbox monitoring services there is no excuse for not having data on your sends. Use this data to drive improvements to your program.
  10. Send a welcome message. Introduce yourself, introduce your program, get your message in front of your new subscriber as soon as possible after they subscribed. They signup because they’re interested in what you have to offer, get into their inbox ASAP to engage them before they move on.

It’s 2017, time to step up.
 

Related Posts

Six best practices for every mailer

People get into all sorts of details when talking about best practices. But so much of email depends on the type of email and the target market and the goals of the sender. It’s difficult to come up with universal best practices.
I’ve said in the past that I think that best practices are primarily technical. I don’t believe there is a best frequency or a best time to send mail or a best image to text ratio.
My top 6 best practices every marketer should be doing (and too few are).

Read More

Organizational security and doxxing

The security risks of organizational doxxing. 
These are risks every email marketer needs to understand. As collectors of data they are a major target for hackers and other bad people. Even worse, many marketers don’t collect valid data and risk implicating the wrong people if their data is ever stolen. I have repeatedly talked about incidents where people get mail not intended for them. I’ve talked about this before, in a number of posts talking about misdirected email. Consumerist, as well, has documented many incidents of companies mailing the wrong person with PII. Many of these stories end with the company not allowing the recipient to remove the address on the account because the user can’t prove they own the account.
I generally focus on the benefits to the company to verify addresses. There are definite deliverability advantages to making sure email address belongs to the account owner. But there’s also the PR benefits of not revealing PII attached to the wrong email address. With Ashley Madison nearly every article mentioned that the email address was never confirmed. But how many other companies don’t verify email addresses and risk losing personally damaging data belonging to non customers.
Data verification is so important. So very, very important. We’ve gone beyond the point where any big sender should just believe that the addresses users give them are accurate. They need to do it for their own business reasons and they need to do it to prevent incorrect PII from being leaked and shared.

Read More

How do unengaged recipients hurt delivery?

In the comments Ulrik asks: “How can unengaged recipients hurt delivery if they aren’t complaining? What feedback mechanism is there to hurt the the delivery rate besides that?”
There are a number of things that ISPs are monitoring besides complaint rates, although they are being cautious about revealing what and how they are measuring things. I expect that ISPs are measuring things like:

Read More