Good morning DMARC
I’m thinking I may need to deploy DMARC report automation sooner rather than later.
… and so on, and on, and on for a lot further down the mailbox.
I’m thinking I may need to deploy DMARC report automation sooner rather than later.
… and so on, and on, and on for a lot further down the mailbox.
Earlier today a twitter user calling himself Email Prankster released copies of email conversations with various members of the current US administration. Based on his twitter feed, and articles from BBC News and CNN, it appears that the prankster forged “friendly from” names in emails to staffers.
A bunch of folks will jump on this bandwagon and start making all sorts of claims about how this kind of thing would be prevented if the Whitehouse and other government offices would just implement DMARC. Problem is, that’s not true. It wouldn’t have helped at all in this case. Looking at the email screenshots all of the mail seems to come from legitimately registered addresses at free email providers like mail.com, gmail.com, and yandex.com.
One image indicates that some spam filter noticed there may be a problem. But apparently SUSPECTED_SPAM in the subject line wasn’t enough to make recipients think twice about checking the email.
The thing is, this is not “hacking” and this isn’t “spear phishing” and it’s not even really spoofing. It’s social engineering, at best. Maybe.
A security researcher has identified a rendering flaw that allows for “perfect” phishing emails. From his website:
Read MoreWe often want to know whether two hostnames are controlled by the same person, or not.
Read More