Dead addresses tell us things

There was confirmation this week that the increase in “user unknown” messages from Yahoo is actually Yahoo cleaning out abandoned accounts. At the same time a Yahoo is sending out notifications to folks to log into mail.

The first thing every sender should do is remove all these Yahoo addresses from their lists. They’re done, kaput. Gone.

There are some other things worth doing with them, though. Some of these things are informative, they will help help you understand your subscribers and list lifecycle better. Others are protective, they will improve your data hygiene over the long term.

We know that Yahoo disabled a bunch of email addresses that have not been in use for at least a year. There are some other bits of information we have that give us a broader picture of what is happening.

  1. About a year ago, this same thing happened. There was an increase in the number of user unknowns at Yahoo (Thanks, Tara, for noticing I wrote about it last year). It’s possible that they’re scheduling address purges on a yearly basis.
  2. I mentioned reports of an increase in user unknowns from Yahoo in April 2013.
  3. Yahoo is sending mail to users alerting them that if they don’t log into their mail accounts they’ll lose access to mail – I got one of these to the address tied to my flickr account.

Based on this information, I presuppose the following.

  1. Yahoo has an process for reviewing and disabling accounts that happens in the early spring and has done for at least 5 years.
  2. The addresses that started bouncing recently are accounts that have been not logged into for between 12 and 23 months. 12 because this is what the re-engagement campaigns are indicating. 23 because we can assume that some addresses were at 11 months for the disabling a year ago.

We have a known population of yahoo.com addresses that we can assume were abandoned between April 2017 and March 2018. Now you know how many Yahoo addresses go bad in a 11 – 12 month period.

We can ask questions about those addresses that will give us more insight into our subscriber list and how we should handle expiring addresses and data hygiene.

  1. When did those addresses join your list?
  2. When was the last open? click?
  3. Is that address associated with an active login or purchasing account?

With a known population of freemail addresses and some certainty on when the recipients stopped logging into their accounts we can develop data hygiene rules that make sense for our business. It’s not just picking a certain period of time to stop mailing. We can model the behaviour of freemail users knowing when they abandoned their accounts and make sensible policies.

Email news today
New office

Related Posts

Thoughts on Data Hygiene

One of the big deliverability vs. marketing arguments has to do with data hygiene and dropping inactive users. Marketers hate that deliverability people tell them to let subscribers go after a long time of no activity from the subscriber.

Read More

OATH and Microsoft updates

I’ve seen multiple people asking questions about what’s going to happen with the Yahoo and AOL FBLs after the transition to the new Oath infrastructure. The most current information we have says that the AOL FBL (IP based) is going away. This FBL is handled by the AOL infrastructure. As AOL users are moved to the new infrastructure any complaints based on their actions will come through the Yahoo complaint feedback loop (CFL). The Yahoo CFL is domain based. Anyone who has not signed up for the Yahoo CFL should do so.
When registering you will need each domain and the selectors you’re planning on using. Yahoo will send an email with a confirmation link that needs to be clicked on within a short period of time in order to activate the FBL.
Microsoft’s SNDS program had an outage at the end of last week. That’s been fixed, but the missing data will not be back populated into the system. This has happened a couple times in the past. It seems the system gets a live feed of data. If, for some reason, the data is interrupted, then it’s gone and doesn’t get populated.

Read More

What kind of mail do filters target?

All to often we think of filters as a linear scale. There’s blocking on one end, and there’s an inbox on the other. Every email falls somewhere on that line.
Makes sense, right? Bad mail is blocked, good mail goes to the inbox. The bulk folder exists for mail that’s not bad enough to block, but isn’t good enough to go to the inbox.
Once we get to that model, we can think of filters as just different tolerances for what is bad and good. Using the same model, we can see aggressive filters block more mail and send more mail to bulk, while letting less into the inbox. There are also permissive filters that block very little mail and send most mail to the inbox.
That’s a somewhat useful model, but it doesn’t really capture the full complexity of filters. There isn’t just good mail and bad mail. Mail isn’t simply solicited or unsolicited. Filters take into account any number of factors before deciding what to do with mail.

Read More