Mailbox providers

The other day I tweeted that I often used the term “receivers” to describe receiving MTAs.

A number of folks chimed in and the clear consensus was that the term most people used was “mailbox provider.”

The big problem I have for mailbox provider is that when we’re talking about filtering, or reputation, mailbox providers are not a monolith. Providers have different ways of filtering mail and that’s relevant to some discussions.

But, for now, I’ll use mailbox provider instead of receiver.

1 comment

  1. Andrew Kugler says

    This is a common issue in the Deliverability world, non-standardized terms, and terms that don’t necessarily encompass what they are intended to mean. It creates an artificially high barrier to entry for understanding.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.